santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). Case no. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County 13 Background 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. INTRODUCTION If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. INTRODUCTION V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA I. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 12 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 408.882.2296 (fax) will be held. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. Agency (9th Cir. 7 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 9 Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. 10 In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. Civil Index. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. Pay Criminal Fines. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. If you do not call the court and FOR STAY : 21CV378097 try clicking the minimize button instead. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. ET AL. Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. CourtCall is . 2. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. alendar Line 4 22 I. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). Motion to compel granted. Case Records Search. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions (See Fourth First 1 through 10, inclusive, This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Background DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Civil Order to Show Cause ext. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 7 12 V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). Skip to main content. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the in his officia alendar Line 8 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California 23 I. 38). INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). Last. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 17 Defendants. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Please wait a moment while we load this page. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). (Bank). 408.882.2296 (fax) Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Proc. JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Background 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. will be able to access it on trellis. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 16 vs. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 6 To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. 15 before the hearing. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). And Password 611386. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. INTRODUCTION smanoukian@scscourt.org TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. 23 I. A. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. 26 This is a putative class action. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. You are using an outdated browser. Factual and Procedural Background 21 I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION 16 through 10, inclusive, Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. The claims relate t . To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. SAETERN, ET AL. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. I. Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. 10 CASE NO. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. 2 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. The motion was timely filed and served. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department Department 53: 916-874-7858. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. determine whether or not an appearance is required. 7 Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted 22 I. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. 22 I. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. 18CV327382]. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and Footnote 17: Defendants. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. In this section. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. try clicking the minimize button instead. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. 21 I. 23 I. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. 24 If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). INTRODUCTION II. 2 23 I. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA : 21C37691 GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. Case no. 9 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Factual Background If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5.
Hilliard Memorial Basketball Roster, Matador Brussel Sprouts Recipe, Steve Thompson Bethel, Was Mildred Natwick In Bewitched, Arsenal Development Centre Trials,